⚖️ Glossip v. Gross

Monday, June 29, 2015 All day

The Eighth Amendment requires prisoners to show 1.) there is a known and available alternative method of execution and 2.) the challenged method of execution poses a demonstrated risk of severe pain, with the burden of proof resting on the prisoners, not the state. Decided June 29, 2015 (argued April 29, 2015). Opinion of the Court: Samuel Alito → go there Dissenting: Breyer, Sotomayor. Applied: the Eighth Amendment → go there Topic: Capital punishment. Glossip v. Gross, 576 U.S. 863 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 5–4, that lethal injections using midazolam to kill prisoners convicted of capital crimes do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court found that condemned prisoners can only challenge their method of execution after providing a known and available alternative method. Wiki link

⚖️ Glossip v. Gross