⚖️ New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
Public officials, to prove they were libelled, must show not only that a statement is false, but also that it was published with malicious intent (knowing the statement was false, or recklessly disregarding possible falseness). Decided March 9, 1964 (argued January 6, 1964). Opinion of the Court: William J. Brennan → go there Applied: the First Amendment → go there Applied: the Fourteenth Amendment → go there Topic: Freedom of speech and of the press. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), is a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that the freedom of speech protections in the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution limit the ability of public officials to sue for defamation. The decision held that if a plaintiff in a defamation lawsuit is a public official or candidate for public office, then not only must they prove the normal elements of defamation—publication of a false defamatory statement to a third party—they must also prove that the statement was made with "actual malice", meaning the defendant either knew the statement was false or recklessly disregarded whether it might be false. Wiki link