A California law that limits new residents' benefits for the first year they live in the state is an unconstitutional violation of their right to travel. Decided May 17, 1999 (argued January 13, 1999). Opinion of the Court: John Paul Stevens → go there Dissenting: Rehnquist, Thomas. Topic: Freedom of movement. Sáenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489 (1999), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States discussed whether there is a constitutional right to travel from one state to another. The case was a reaffirmation of the principle that citizens select states and not the other way around. Wiki link